![]() Supreme Court legitimacy at risk in abortion ban case, Northeastern legal expert says It’s a closely watched case, Urman says, because it has been over a decade since the Supreme Court weighed in on the Second Amendment. The courts have since clarified “proper cause” to mean that an applicant must demonstrate “a special need for self-protection distinguishable from that of the general community or of persons engaged in the same profession.”Īt issue is whether the state’s denial of two petitioners’ applications to carry a handgun on the grounds that they lacked proper cause violated the Second Amendment to the U.S. Specifically, the law requires that applicants show “proper cause” for a license to possess and carry a handgun outside the home. Bruen, which deals with a New York law that limits a person’s ability to carry concealed guns. ![]() The Supreme Court also will be taking up a major Second Amendment case, New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. Supreme Court at Northeastern, “but actually there’s two other areas that are very important: the court’s continued expansion of religious liberty claims and the federal government’s ability to require vaccines in certain sectors of the workforce during a pandemic.” “ Everyone’s waiting for Dobbs,” says Dan Urman, who teaches constitutional law and the modern U.S. 1, but a decision is not expected until later this year. The court heard oral arguments in the case on Dec. Wade upheld abortion rights and prohibited states from banning abortions before fetal viability, which is roughly 23 weeks. The Supreme Court has indicated that it may roll back constitutional protections established by its 1973 decision in Roe v. Photo by Matthew Modoono/Northeastern University The law bans most abortions after 15 weeks.ĭaniel Urman, director of hybrid and online programs in the school of law, and director of the law and public policy minor. Here are the other cases experts are keeping a close watch on this year.Ītop the list is a challenge to a restrictive abortion law enacted by Mississippi in 2018, Dobbs v. The latter, which the court let stand, requires health-care workers at facilities that get Medicare or Medicaid funding be vaccinated. The former, which the high court struck down, required that all companies with more than 100 employees enforce a rule that their workers get the vaccine or else be tested on a weekly basis. There were two requirements in question, one overseen by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, the other through the Department of Health and Human Services and its Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. The court on Thursday blocked one of Biden’s private sector vaccine mandate s, implemented amid a rise in COVID-19 cases, while allowing another requirement to stand. The high court last week ruled on President Joe Biden’s vaccine mandates-a case that had garnered much attention in recent weeks as the omicron variant reignites the COVID-19 pandemic. Justices will weigh in on cases that could affect people’s right to an abortion, their possession of firearms outside their home, and their free exercise of religion. Supreme Court decision on President Joe Biden’s vaccine mandate shows, the nation’s highest court has a full docket of important issues this term.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |