![]() First, we investigate to what extent individual factors associate with the mobility of researchers. However, there is still a very limited understanding of the different mobility patterns among scholars with various socio-demographic characteristics. International mobility in academia can enhance the human and social capital of researchers and consequently their scientific outcome. Comparing the centrality of mobile and non-mobile researchers in the co-authorship networks reveals a higher social capital advantage for mobile researchers. Indeed, researchers who have started mobility at the advanced career stages had a better scientific outcome. Also, we found a positive correlation between mobility and scientific outcomes, but no apparent difference between females and males. We observed more mobility for Social scientists at the advanced career stage, while researchers in other fields prefer to move at earlier career stages. Across genders, researchers in the Physical sciences have the most and in the Social sciences the least rate of mobility. Our findings uncover gender inequality in international mobility across scientific fields and countries. Having international co-authors increases the probability of international movement. Results show that researchers from North America and Sub-Saharan Africa, particularly female ones, have the lowest, respectively, highest tendency towards international mobility. ![]() We also analyzed the co-authorship network of researchers and compared centrality measures of “mobile” and “non-mobile” researchers. To compare the researchers’ scientific outcomes, we considered the number of publications and received citations as indicators, as well as the number of unique co-authors in all their publications. For this purpose, we used a bibliometric approach to track the mobility of authors. Second, we explore the relationship between mobility and scientific activity and impact. First, we investigate to what extent individuals’ factors (e.g., country, career stage, and field of research) associate with the mobility of male and female researchers. By studying these differences, we can detect inequalities in access to scholarly networks across borders, which can cause disparities in scientific advancement. We believe that these results, though preliminary, have significant implications for the design of programmes and alliances. The number of countries in the global network establishes stronger partnerships, forming tightly knit groups and spreading influence more widely among countries with a preference to collaborate within the region instead of collaborating with out-region countries. We found that internationalization in science is growing in all disciplines. As the international research landscape is clearly undergoing continued structural change, we aim to analyze dynamics in collaboration strategies/patterns at the global and disciplinary level, and to investigate whether countries are collaborating more diversely within their region compared to outside their own region using different approaches. ![]() The evolution of the patterns of collaborative strategies plays an important role in the social construction of science to design efficient research policies and to support the production of knowledge.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |